<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Underestimated UI techniques: Morphing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulbakaus.com/2009/10/08/underestimated-ui-techniques-morphing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulbakaus.com/2009/10/08/underestimated-ui-techniques-morphing/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Paul Bakaus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:58:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin A. Shelton &#124; Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Links of the Week: October 21st</title>
		<link>http://paulbakaus.com/2009/10/08/underestimated-ui-techniques-morphing/comment-page-1/#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin A. Shelton &#124; Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Links of the Week: October 21st</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulbakaus.com/?p=251#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>[...] Okay, this one is more about classes, inheritance, polymorphism, and a few other dry, boring topics. I&#8217;m only linking it for the picture. Enjoy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Okay, this one is more about classes, inheritance, polymorphism, and a few other dry, boring topics. I&#8217;m only linking it for the picture. Enjoy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My daily readings 10/20/2009 &#171; Strange Kite</title>
		<link>http://paulbakaus.com/2009/10/08/underestimated-ui-techniques-morphing/comment-page-1/#comment-1657</link>
		<dc:creator>My daily readings 10/20/2009 &#171; Strange Kite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulbakaus.com/?p=251#comment-1657</guid>
		<description>[...] The Sea of Ideas » Underestimated UI techniques: Morphing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Sea of Ideas » Underestimated UI techniques: Morphing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://paulbakaus.com/2009/10/08/underestimated-ui-techniques-morphing/comment-page-1/#comment-1654</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulbakaus.com/?p=251#comment-1654</guid>
		<description>James Peter --- Please do release the code, I&#039;ve faced the same need a few times and been intimated to build it myself. Thanks a bunch.

Is every case of a composite UI (some nested panels and groups, for example), in which a user action causes some part(s) of that composite to change (e.g. grow, shrink, add children, etc.) while the context around remains the same a &quot;MORPH&quot; candidate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Peter &#8212; Please do release the code, I&#8217;ve faced the same need a few times and been intimated to build it myself. Thanks a bunch.</p>
<p>Is every case of a composite UI (some nested panels and groups, for example), in which a user action causes some part(s) of that composite to change (e.g. grow, shrink, add children, etc.) while the context around remains the same a &#8220;MORPH&#8221; candidate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://paulbakaus.com/2009/10/08/underestimated-ui-techniques-morphing/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulbakaus.com/?p=251#comment-1650</guid>
		<description>@James: Of course you should release the code! Just push your repository up to GitHub and we&#039;ll all help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James: Of course you should release the code! Just push your repository up to GitHub and we&#8217;ll all help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Duncan</title>
		<link>http://paulbakaus.com/2009/10/08/underestimated-ui-techniques-morphing/comment-page-1/#comment-1648</link>
		<dc:creator>John Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulbakaus.com/?p=251#comment-1648</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed that MacOS X uses a lot of morphing transitions since the inclusion of CoreAnimation. They are often subtle but helpful visual clues as to what is happening, like smooth scrolling a toolbar into view and stuff like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that MacOS X uses a lot of morphing transitions since the inclusion of CoreAnimation. They are often subtle but helpful visual clues as to what is happening, like smooth scrolling a toolbar into view and stuff like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Peter</title>
		<link>http://paulbakaus.com/2009/10/08/underestimated-ui-techniques-morphing/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>James Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulbakaus.com/?p=251#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>I agree. Morphing is a great UI tool. When used appropriately (i.e. sparingly) it can really help to give that visual kick to a page. Morphing is particularly great when changing the focus/layout of a page. If the changes happen instantly users become confused and dissociated.

Unfortunately complicated morphing effects are somewhat limited in jQuery &amp; jQuery UI. The inability to sync animation means that change involving multiple elements at once will always be problematic. I&#039;ve actually just spent the better part of a week extending jQuery to allow it to synchronise multiple animations and snap together edges to allow for really high quality effects. I can release the code if there&#039;s any interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Morphing is a great UI tool. When used appropriately (i.e. sparingly) it can really help to give that visual kick to a page. Morphing is particularly great when changing the focus/layout of a page. If the changes happen instantly users become confused and dissociated.</p>
<p>Unfortunately complicated morphing effects are somewhat limited in jQuery &amp; jQuery UI. The inability to sync animation means that change involving multiple elements at once will always be problematic. I&#8217;ve actually just spent the better part of a week extending jQuery to allow it to synchronise multiple animations and snap together edges to allow for really high quality effects. I can release the code if there&#8217;s any interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: August Lilleaas</title>
		<link>http://paulbakaus.com/2009/10/08/underestimated-ui-techniques-morphing/comment-page-1/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>August Lilleaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulbakaus.com/?p=251#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>Just a FYI: I thought your green buttons were images, because of the lack of a `cursor: pointer;` :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a FYI: I thought your green buttons were images, because of the lack of a `cursor: pointer;` <img src='http://paulbakaus.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sherrod</title>
		<link>http://paulbakaus.com/2009/10/08/underestimated-ui-techniques-morphing/comment-page-1/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>sherrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulbakaus.com/?p=251#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>Cute example, but I take issue with the description of your solution: &quot;with morphing, it not only looks hot but solves the issue in style.&quot;

I&#039;m a big believer in &quot;form follows function,&quot; so this is definitely just eye candy and not a UI technique to me. Perhaps you should give a more useful example. I like the sexiness of morphing one element into another, but I can&#039;t think of an instance in which its use provides enough extra clarity to compensate for the complexity of implementing the morph transition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cute example, but I take issue with the description of your solution: &#8220;with morphing, it not only looks hot but solves the issue in style.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big believer in &#8220;form follows function,&#8221; so this is definitely just eye candy and not a UI technique to me. Perhaps you should give a more useful example. I like the sexiness of morphing one element into another, but I can&#8217;t think of an instance in which its use provides enough extra clarity to compensate for the complexity of implementing the morph transition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
